Please wait a minute...
 
 首页  期刊介绍 编委会 投稿指南 征稿简则 期刊征订 广告服务 留言板 联系我们 English
解放军预防医学杂志  2016, Vol. 34 Issue (2): 187-190    
  研究论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
护理人员工作量影响因素现状调查问卷的编制及信效度检验
王玲,孙圣凯①*,陈孝储,李美茹,何久智,程彬①*
锦州医科大学武警后勤学院附属医院研究生培养基地, 辽宁锦州 121001
Development and Reliability and Validity Test of the Questionnaire for Evaluting Status and Affecting Factors of Nursing Workload
WANG Ling,SUN Shengkai,CHEN Xiaochu,LI Meiru,HE Jiuzhi,CHENG Bin
Training Base of Jinzhou Medical University,Affiliated Hospital of Logistics University of Chinese Armed Police Forces,Liaoning Jinzhou 121001,China
全文: PDF(1264 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 编制护理人员工作量影响因素现状调查问卷,并进行信效度检验。 方法 采用文献回顾法、头脑风暴法、辩证分析法及半结构式访谈法拟定量表条目池。选取18名专家进行2轮德尔菲专家咨询形成初量表。选取335名护理人员对初量表进行预调查。专家咨询阶段条目筛选采用“界值法”;预调查阶段采用项目分析、探索性因素分析、内容效度、相关性分析、内部一致性检验、分半信度、重测信度等对量表进行评价。 结果 初步形成的条目池包括57个条目,经德尔菲专家咨询形成50个条目,经项目分析、探索性因素分析后最终剩余30个条目。2轮函询专家权威系数分别为0.869 、0.853,专家协调系数分别为0.218、0.570(P均<0.01)。预调查阶段,探索性因子分析提取5个公因子,累积贡献率为60.389%,内容效度为0.855,Cronbach’s α系数为0.879,分半信度为0.924,重测信度为0.821。 结论 编制的问卷具有较高的权威性,信效度良好,可作为护理工作量影响因素的测量工具。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 护理工作量影响因素问卷调查德尔菲法信度效度    
Abstract:Objective To develop the the questionnaire for evaluting status and affecting factors of nursing workload and to test its reliability and validity.Methods Literature reading,brainstorming,dialectical analysis and semi-structured interviews were performed to identify items pool of the questionnaire.Two rounds of Delphi method with 18 experts were performed to develop a predict questionnaire.The questionnaire was applied to 335 nurses to carry on the project analysis and to test its reliability and validity."Boundary value method" was used in Delphi method stage.Item analysis,exploratory factor analysis,content validity,correlation analysis,internal consistency check,split-half coefficient test and retest reliability were used in preliminary investigation stage.Results A 57-item questionnaire was originally developed and 50 of them were left after Delphi consultation,then after item analysis and exploratory factor analysis,30 items remained at last.In two rounds of Delphi method,the rates of questionnaire retrieve were 100% and 90% respectively,the authoritative coefficients were 0.869 and 0.853 respectively,the coordination coefficients were 0.218 and 0.570 respectively(P<0.01).Five factors were extracted with cumulative contribution rate of 60.389% in exploratory factor analysis,the content validity was 0.855,the Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.879,the split-half coefficient was 0.924 and the retest reliability was 0.821.Conclusions The questionnaire has the high authority and is proved to be reliable and valid,which can be used to assess status and affecting factors of nursing workload.
Key wordsnursing workload    affecting factors    questionaires    reliability    validity
     出版日期: 2016-09-01
通讯作者: E-mail:15822125966@163.com,sskrui@163.com   
引用本文:   
王玲,孙圣凯,陈孝储,李美茹,何久智,程彬. 护理人员工作量影响因素现状调查问卷的编制及信效度检验[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(2): 187-190.
WANG Ling,SUN Shengkai,CHEN Xiaochu,LI Meiru,HE Jiuzhi,CHENG Bin. Development and Reliability and Validity Test of the Questionnaire for Evaluting Status and Affecting Factors of Nursing Workload. Journal of Preventive Medicine of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 2016, 34(2): 187-190.
链接本文:  
http://manu37.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_jsyxkx/jfj/CN/      或      http://manu37.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_jsyxkx/jfj/CN/Y2016/V34/I2/187
〔1〕 陈红,蒋红.护理工作量影响因素的研究进展〔J〕.护理学杂志,2013,28(10):90.
〔2〕 MYNY D,VAN GOUBERGEN D,GOBERT M,et al.Non-direct patient care factors influencing nursing workload: a review of the literature〔J〕.Journal of Advanced Nursing,2011,67(10):2109.
〔3〕 MYNY D,VAN HECKE A,DE BACQUER D,et al.Determining a set of measurable and relevant factors affecting nursing workload in the acute care hospital setting:a cross-sectional study〔J〕.International Journal of Nursing Studies,2012,49(4):427.
〔4〕 成守珍,汪牡丹,陈利芬,等.护理安全质量评价指标体系的构建〔J〕.中华护理杂志,2014,49(3):270。
〔5〕 陈媛.护理硕士专业学位研究生临床能力考评指标体系的研究〔D〕.南方医科大学,2012.
〔6〕 吴明隆.问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用〔M〕.重庆:重庆大学出版社,2011:172-184.
〔7〕 曾光.现代流行病学方法与应用〔M〕.北京:北京医科大学协和医科大学联合出版社,1996:257-259.
〔8〕 史静琤,莫显昆,孙振球.量表编制中内容效度指数的应用〔J〕.中南大学学报,2012,37(2):152。

[1] 保宏翔. 驻防高原男性新兵生理及认知功能改变的影响因素研究[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(5): 653-655.
[2] 郑文秋,郝春艳. 锦州市社区老年高血压患病现状及影响因素[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(4): 513-515.
[3] 王晓卫,赫欣. 大学新生军训期间焦虑状况及影响因素分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(4): 559-560.
[4] 王基野,尚磊,马涛,攻博,王霞,骆文静,徐玫. 入伍前身体锻炼对新兵基础训练阶段焦虑情绪的影响[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(4): 561-563.
[5] 章松, 高婉君, 刘永良, 杨斌辉, 范志刚, 王玉玲, 毕育学. 秦巴山区2乡镇中老年人脑卒中的影响因素[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(3): 335-337.
[6] 何海艳, 陈静, 李超, 赵莹, 吴伟慎, 张颖. 天津市20岁以下乙肝病毒携带者父母心理健康状况及影响因素[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(3): 389-391.
[7] 杨忠委,王华然,李迎凯,孙欣,王福玉,李君文,尹静. 饮水澄清消毒药剂对浑浊水的澄清效果评价[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(2): 211-212.
[8] 孟凡祥. 某医院脑卒中患者发病影响因素调查[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(2): 272-272.
[9] 宁淑娥, 孟 宇, 魏 刚, 齐 磊, 李靖明. 学员用军校理科大学教员评价量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(1): 36-39.
[10] 王 茜, 冯大跃, 李金明. 某部专业技术干部的生命质量及其影响因素[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(1): 29-31.
[11] 丁 魁, 孟新珍①, 赵小强. 戈壁地域驻训士兵职业倦怠状况及其影响因素[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(1): 57-58.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《解放军预防医学杂志》编辑部
地址:天津市和平区大理道1号,邮编:300050  电话:022-84655185  E-mail:JYYX@chinajournal.net.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn