Please wait a minute...
 
 首页  期刊介绍 编委会 投稿指南 征稿简则 期刊征订 广告服务 留言板 联系我们 English
解放军预防医学杂志  2016, Vol. 34 Issue (5): 700-703    
  研究论著 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于生存分析法的胰岛素使用方式对妊娠糖尿病围术期的影响
崔健, 邵利萍, 沙静*
新疆生产建设兵团医院妇产科, 乌鲁木齐 830002 ①新疆维吾尔自治区中医医院培训部
Effect of Insulin Based on Survival Analysis on Perioperative Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
CUI Jian, SHAO Liping, SHA Jing
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Urumqi 830002, China
全文: PDF(1327 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 目的 探讨皮下注射、持续胰岛素泵及联合应用对妊娠糖尿病(GDM)围术期的影响,为有效、安全使用胰岛素提供依据。方法 抽取2012年5月-2015年1月行剖宫产的GDM 120例作为研究对象,根据胰岛素使用方法分为A组(皮下注射)35例、B组(单纯持续胰岛素泵注射)42例、C组(持续胰岛素泵联合皮下注射)43例。使用生存分析法分析3种胰岛素注射方法对血糖水平、胰岛素用量、手术时间、手术出血量、低血糖反应、切口愈合、住院时间、新生儿不良结局的影响。结果 C组血糖水平、胰岛素用量、低血糖反应发生率、住院时间均低于A组和B组,切口愈合优于A、B组(P<0.05);3组新生儿不良结局、手术时间、手术出血量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);生存分析结果显示,C组和B组空腹血糖控制效果明显优于A组,C组餐后2 h血糖、胰岛素用量低于A、B组,住院天数少于A、B组。结论 持续胰岛素泵联合皮下注射对GDM围术期效果优于单纯胰岛素泵及皮下注射,且可减少胰岛素用量、降低低血糖反应发生率。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 妊娠糖尿病 胰岛素 注射方式 生存分析    
AbstractObjective To evaluate the role of intermittent subcutaneous insulin injection, continuous subcutaneous injection, and insulin pumps in the treatment of perioperative gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in order to ensure effective and safe use of insulin. Methods A total of 120 GDM patients undergoing cesarean section between May 2012 and January 2015 were randomly selected as subjects. According to use methods of insulin, 35 cases were regarded as group A (subcutaneous injection), 42 cases as group B (pure continuous insulin pump injection), 43 as group C (continuous subcutaneous injection combined with the insulin pump). Survival analysis was used to study the effect of the three methods of insulin injection on blood glucose, insulin dosage, operation time, blood loss, low blood glucose reaction, incision healing, hospital stay, and neonatal adverse outcomes. Results The results showed that continuous subcutaneous injection combined with an insulin pump decreased blood glucose levels, insulin dosage, incidence of hypoglycemia and length of hospital stay , these indexes were all lower than those of group A and group B, and that incision healing was better than that of group A and B(P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the neonatal adverse outcome, operation time and surgical blood loss between the three groups (P>0.05). Survival analysis showed that the fasting blood glucose was better controlled in group C and group B than in group A, and that blood glucose after a meal, insulin dosage, and hospital stay in group C were lower or shorter than in group A and group B. Conclusion The combination of continuous insulin pumps with subcutaneous injection is a more effective treatment of perioperative GDM than theinsulin pump alone or subcutaneous injection of insulin, for it can reduce the dosage of insulin and blood glucose reactions.
Key wordsgestational diabetes mellitus    insulin    injection method    survival analysis
     出版日期: 2016-11-02
引用本文:   
崔健, 邵利萍, 沙静. 基于生存分析法的胰岛素使用方式对妊娠糖尿病围术期的影响[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(5): 700-703.
CUI Jian, SHAO Liping, SHA Jing. Effect of Insulin Based on Survival Analysis on Perioperative Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Journal of Preventive Medicine of Chinese People's Liberation Army, 2016, 34(5): 700-703.
链接本文:  
http://manu37.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_jsyxkx/jfj/CN/      或      http://manu37.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_jsyxkx/jfj/CN/Y2016/V34/I5/700
[1] BAZ B,RIVELINE J P,GAUTIER J F.Endocrinology of pregnancy:gestational diabetes mellitus:definition,aetiological and clinical aspects[J].Eur J Endocrinol,2015,174(2):R43.
[2] KELLEY K W,CARROLL D G,MEYER A.A review of current treatment strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus[J].Drugs Context,2015,4:212282.
[3] POOMALAR G K.Changing trends in management of gestational diabetes mellitus[J].World J Diabetes,2015,6(2):284.
[4] HUYNH J,XIONG G,BENTLEY-LEWIS R.A systematic review of metabolite profiling in gestational diabetes mellitus[J].Diabetologia,2014,57(12):2453.
[5] XU J,ZHAO Y H,CHEN Y P,et al.Maternal circulating concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, leptin, and adiponectin in gestational diabetes mellitus:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Scientific World Journal,2014,2014:926932.
[6] 申娟茹,李俊玲.妊娠糖尿病护理干预研究进展[J].护理研究,2014,28(2):145.
[7] 张实,王爱玲,吴学玲.控制血糖对COPD合并糖尿病患者急性加重频率及平均住院天数的影响[J].重庆医学,2015,44(23):3246.
[8] 焦祥龙.冠状动脉旁路移植术患者围手术期血糖水平对手术预后和住院天数的影响[D].泰山医学院,2014.
[9] 高赛赛,张爱鸣,巫小燕,等.动态血糖仪监测胰岛素皮下泵短期治疗妊娠糖尿病有效性和安全性观察[J].浙江中西医结合杂志,2015,25(5):450.
[10] 王春秀,付庆敏,张淑荣,等.不同胰岛素注射方式及护理干预治疗糖尿病疗效分析[J].中国药业,2014,23(9):65.
[11] 杨晓梅,张惠蛟,李芳,等.胰岛素剂量参考表在ICU持续泵注胰岛素患者中的应用[J].护理实践与研究,2014,11(4):21.
[12] 董玉英.妊娠糖尿病胰岛素的合理应用[J].糖尿病新世界,2007,10(1):42.
[13] 王凯航,向菲.妊娠糖尿病胰岛素抵抗影响因素的研究[J].贵阳医学院学报,2015,40(1):76.
[14] 万惠,姚伟峰,钱铁镛,等.妊娠糖尿病胰岛素抵抗和胰岛β细胞分泌功能的变化[J].江苏医药,2013,39(3):337.
[15] 陆蓓亦,朱自强,虞斌.妊娠期糖尿病妊娠中晚期胰岛素抵抗及胰岛B细胞功能的研究[J].中国妇幼保健,2015,30(36):6455.
[16] 张煜.血清钙与妊娠糖尿病胰岛素抵抗相关性的研究[D].广东医学院,2012.
[17] 刘晶,刘永明,周国用.血清基质细胞趋化因子-1α C 反应蛋白水平与妊娠糖尿病胰岛素抵抗相关性研究[J].检验医学与临床,2015,12(14):2019.
[18] 赵海英,王杏芹,牛志浩,等.脂联素、瘦素、抵抗素与妊娠糖尿病胰岛素抵抗相关性分析[J].医学动物防制,2015,31(9):1042.
[19] 张宏秀,陈文玮,孙丽洲.妊娠期糖尿病胰岛素抵抗的研究进展[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2011,12(2):154.
[20] 郭艳蒲,崔淑娟.妊娠晚期糖尿病患者胰岛素抵抗与胰岛素分泌的临床研究[J].中国全科医学,2011,14(2):122.
[1] 邵利萍,谭晓慧,王晶心. 老年糖尿病足患者院外持续中医健康管理干预的效果[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(4): 522-524.
[2] 张坤, 任巧华, 吴韬, 杜俊文. 西格列汀联合二甲双胍对血糖升高代谢综合征的干预作用[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2016, 34(3): 364-366.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
版权所有 © 2015 《解放军预防医学杂志》编辑部
地址:天津市和平区大理道1号,邮编:300050  电话:022-84655185  E-mail:JYYX@chinajournal.net.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn