两种精原干细胞高效能纯化方法的比较研究*

doi:10.12047/j.cjap.6046.2021.056

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的: 比较贴壁分离法和免疫磁珠法纯化小鼠精原干细胞(mSSCs) 的优缺点。方法: 分别选取10只12-15日龄的雄性C57BL/6小鼠,颈椎脱臼法处死,摘取睾丸用酶消化法获得曲细精管单细胞悬液,分别用贴壁分离法和免疫磁珠法从单细胞悬液中分离纯化mSSCs,并针对两种方法在细胞数量、分离效率以及对细胞增殖生长的影响等方面进行比较。结果: 两种纯化方法均可从小鼠曲细精管单细胞悬液中分离纯化得到干细胞,并可在体外培养后呈现出典型的精原干细胞特有的葡萄串状克隆,体外连续培养增殖超3个月。10只小鼠的睾丸经差异贴壁法纯化后可以得到3×10⁵±0.4×10⁵个mSSCs(n=5),细胞回收率(纯化后细胞数/曲细精管单细胞悬液细胞数)为1.5%±0.1%(n=5);经免疫磁珠法可以得到6×10⁵±0.4×10⁵个mSSCs(n=5),细胞回收率为3.0%±0.1%(n=5),免疫磁珠法得到的干细胞数量更高。差异贴壁法得到的干细胞更纯,因为体外培养5 d左右即得到干细胞集落,而免疫磁珠法得到的干细胞则约10 d才可以看到明显的细胞集落,但是两种纯化方法对细胞体外长期增殖生长没有明显的影响。结论: 两种方法均可以纯化得到高质量的mSSCs,,但两种方法各有优缺点。差异贴壁法较免疫磁珠法经济、实用,无需购买专门的设备和抗体磁珠,但获得的细胞数量相对较低,用时也较长。

关键词: 曲细精管, 精原干细胞, 免疫磁珠法, 差异贴壁法, 小鼠

Abstract: Objective: To compare the advantages and disadvantages of the differential attachment method and immunomagnetic bead method for purification of mouse spermatogonial stem cells (mSSCs). Methods: Ten male C57BL/6 mice aged 12～15 days were selected and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Testes were collected and the seminiferous tubule single cell suspension was obtained by enzymatic digestion. mSSCs were purified by using the differential attachment method and immunomagnetic bead method respectively. Then a detailed comparison of the two methods in terms of cell number, separation efficiency, and impact on cell proliferation and growth was conducted. Results: Both of the methods could isolate and purify stem cells from single cell suspension of mouse seminiferous tubules. mSSCs showed typical grape cluster-like clones in vitro culture, which could be continuously cultured and proliferated for over 3 months in vitro. The testes of 10 mice could obtain 3×10⁵±0.4×10⁵ mSSCs (n=5) by differential attachment method, cell recovery rate (the number of cells after purification/the number of cells of the single cell suspension of seminiferous tubules) was 1.5%±0.1%; 6×10⁵±0.4×10⁵ mSSCs (n= 5) could be obtained by immunomagnetic bead method. The recovery rate was about 3%±0.1%, and the number of stem cells obtained by the immunomagnetic bead method was higher. The stem cells obtained by the differential attachment method were more pure, because the stem cell colonies were preferentially obtained after 5 days of in vitro culture, while the stem cells obtained by the immunomagnetic bead method needed to be cultured for about 10 days before the obvious cell colonies could be observed, but the two types of purification method had no obvious effect on the long-term growth of cells in vitro. Conclusion: Both methods can get high quality mSSCs, but both methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. The differential attachment method is more economical and practical than the other, it does not require special equipment, but the stem cell number obtained is relatively lower and the time needed is longer.

Key words: seminiferous tubules, spermatogonial stem cells, immunomagnetic bead method, differential attachment method, mouse

中图分类号:

Q2-33

张岩, 白音巴图, 于泊洋, 杨铮, 云霞, 任向宇, 刘陶迪. 两种精原干细胞高效能纯化方法的比较研究^*[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 571-576.

ZHANG Yan, Baiyin-batu, YU Bo-yang, YANG Zheng, YUN Xia, REN Xiang-yu, LIU Tao-di. Comparative study of two high-efficiency methods for purifying spermatogonial stem cells[J]. CJAP, 2021, 37(5): 571-576.

参考文献

[1] Ibtisham F, Honaramooz A. Spermatogonial stem cells for in vitro spermatogenesis and in vitro restoration of fertility [J]. Cells, 2020, 9: 745-775.
[2] Guo JT, Grow EJ, Yi C, et al. Chromatin and single-cell RNA-seq profiling reveal dynamic signaling and metabolic transitions during human spermatogonial stem cell development[J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2017, 21: 533-546.
[3] Takehashi M, Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Miki H, et al. Production of knockout mice by gene targeting in multipotent germkine stem cells[J]. Dev Biol, 2007, 312(1): 344-352.
[4] Miao XY, Zhang X. Production of transgenic mice carryingthanatin gene by intratesticular injection[J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2011, 415 (3): 429-433.
[5] Kanatsu-Shinihara M, Kimiko I, Lee J, et al. Generation of pluripotent stem cells from neonatal mouse testis[J]. Cell, 2004, 119(7): 1001-1012.
[6] Guan K, Nayernia K, Maier LS, et al. Pluripotency of spermatogonial stem cells from adult mouse testis[J]. Nature, 2006, 440(7088): 1199-1203.
[7] Dong LH, Gul M, Hildorf S, et al. Xeno-free propgation of spermatogonial stem cells from infant boys[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(21): 5390-5414.
[8] Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Mori Y, Shinihara T. Enrichiment of mouse spermatogonial stem cells based on aldehyde dehydrogenase activity[J]. Biol Reprod, 2013, 89(6): 140-149.
[9] Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Morinoto H, Shinohara T. Enrichment of mouse spermaotogonial stem cells by melanoma cell adhesion molecular expression[J]. Biol Reprod, 2012, 87(6): 139-148.
[10] Kortusuz P, Kose S, Yersal N, et al. Magnetic-based cell isolation technique for the selection of stem cells[J]. Methods Mol Bio, 2018, 1879(1):153-163.
[11] Gassei K, Ehmcke J, Schlatt S. Efficient enrichment of undifferentiated GFR alpha 1+ spermatogonia from immature rat testis by magnetic activated cell sorting[J]. Cell Tissue Res, 2009, 337: 177-183.
[12] Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Spermatogonial stem cells share some, but not all, phenotypic and functional characteristics with other stem cells[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2003, 100(11): 6487-6492.
[13] 张岩, 罗奋华, 刘林宏, 等. 大鼠精原干细胞的高效纯化方法[J]. 中国细胞生物学学报, 2011, 33(5): 543-547.
[14] 王俊龙, 杨施, 田汝辉, 等. 人精原干细胞分离、培养与鉴定[J]. 中华男科学杂, 2015, 21(3): 208-213.
[15] 张岩. 大鼠精原干细胞的长期培养、鉴定及其特异标记基因表达载体的构建[D]. 内蒙古大学, 2011.
[16] 张岩, 吴应积. 精原干细胞来源的多能干细胞的形成及其应用[J]. 生物医学工程学杂志, 2011, 28 (1): 208-212.
[17] Tian J, Ma K, Pei CB, et al. Relative safety of various spermatogenic stem cell purification methods for application in spermatogenic stem cell transplantation [J], Stem Cell Res Ther, 2019, 10: 382-393.
[18] Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Miki H, Takashi S. Enrichment of mouse spermatogonial stem cells by melanoma cell adhesion molecule expression[J]. Biol Reprod, 2012, 87(6): 1-10.
[19] Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Takehashi M, Takashima S, et al. Homing of mouse spermatogonial stem cells to germline niche depends on beta1-integrin [J]. Cell Stem Cell, 2008, 3(5): 533-542.
[20] Bai Y, Feng M, Liu S, et al. Differential gene expression in mouse spermatogonial stem cells and embryonic stem cells[J]. Int J Mol Med, 2016, 38(2): 423-432.
[21] Shaun G, Brinster R. Isolation of the spermatogonial stem cell-containing fraction from testes[J]. Cold Spring Harb Protoc, 2017, (4): 289-292.

两种精原干细胞高效能纯化方法的比较研究^*

Comparative study of two high-efficiency methods for purifying spermatogonial stem cells

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王小琴, 石卉, 方小霞, 彭聿平. α1-肾上腺素受体对胶原诱导性关节炎小鼠Treg细胞功能的影响^*[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 449-453.
[2]	陈旭娥, 马婷, 盛良, 王文雯, 李季. IL-21单克隆抗体对MRL/lpr狼疮小鼠的治疗作用^*[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 467-470.
[3]	贺英昊, 方情, 杨玲玲, 陈思敏, 骆燕萍, 钱虹, 齐敏友. 酮康唑对小鼠肝脏和睾丸生理功能的影响^*[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 475-479.
[4]	臧茂林, 余梦迪, 陈重华, 黄梦琪, 罗鹏, 樊红琨, 杨春. 腹主动脉缩窄小鼠心脏结构和功能的动态变化^*[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 479-482.
[5]	赵士博, 黄锁义, 潘智, 彭晓敏, 彭晓靖, 伍世娟, 韦德智, 陈新鹏. 薏苡叶和淫羊藿配伍对小鼠抗疲劳及耐缺氧的作用^*[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 510-513.
[6]	朱明了, 郑珍, 楼恩哲, 赵凯婷, 何施燕, 陈佳玉. 大蒜阿霍烯抗胃癌的作用及分子机制^*[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 514-519.
[7]	陈奕帆, 张李君, 刘清华, 李学文. 西格列汀对糖尿病小鼠心肌重构和自噬的影响及其机制[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 534-537.
[8]	欧阳昕, 李清, 肖爱娇, 陈明人. 艾灸对缺氧缺血性脑损伤新生小鼠的治疗作用^*[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 543-547.
[9]	庞亚蓉, 杜玥, 王志旺, 席建宏, 李济阳, 韦凌霞, 丁茂鹏, 程小丽. 丁苯酞对哮喘小鼠气道黏液高分泌及IL-13、TNF-α的影响^*[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 557-560.
[10]	史华彩, 陈睿, 佘燕玲, 周珊瑶, 雷斯, 郭隽. Atrolnc-1在制动诱导小鼠后肢肌萎缩中的作用研究^*[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(5): 566-570.
[11]	吕烨, 孙小婉, 张聪, 栾志琳. Sox11基因对发育期小鼠大脑皮层神经元迁移的影响[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(4): 337-342.
[12]	杨云昊, 庞芳, 黄思琴, 杨之雪, 朱正威, 代攀, 郭啸, 廖冬梅, 唐成林. 电针对快速衰老小鼠肝脏自噬及脂质代谢的影响[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(4): 365-370.
[13]	齐玉红, 孙思, 王玲, 杨静, 吴光英, 黄琪, 胥文春. 颗粒蛋白前体通过抑制IL-6表达减轻哮喘气道炎症[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(4): 423-428.
[14]	刘淑宁, 丁艳平, 徐郁琴, 康洁, 张晋平, 邵宝平. 黄芪甲苷对辐射诱发肾损伤的干预作用及其机制[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(4): 429-432.
[15]	吴礼循, 吴翔. 白介素11拮抗剂对实验性小鼠肺纤维化的作用[J]. 中国应用生理学杂志, 2021, 37(3): 308-312.