首页  期刊介绍 征稿简则 编委会 期刊征订 广告服务 留言板 联系我们 English

中国应用生理学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 96-103.doi: 10.12047/j.cjap.0091.2021.111

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

上肢精准电磁功率计(臂力计)用于心肺代谢等整体功能评估的临床观察研究*

台文琦1, 孙兴国1, 宋雅1,2, 郝璐1,2, 王继楠1,2, 周晴晴1,2, 石超1, 徐凡1, 张也1, 刘方1   

  1. 1.国家心血管病中心,中国医学科学院阜外医院,北京协和医学院心血管疾病国家重点实验室,心血管疾病国家临床医学研究中心,北京 100037;
    2.重庆医科大学附属康复医院,重庆 400050
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-12 修回日期:2021-01-12 发布日期:2021-10-21
  • 通讯作者: Tel:010-88398300;E-mail: xgsun@lundquist.org
  • 基金资助:
    *国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)课题资助项目(2012AA021009); 国家自然科学基金医学科学部面上项目(81470204); 中国康复医疗机构联合重大项目基金(20160102); 中国医学科学院国家心血管病中心阜外医院科研开发启动基金(2012-YJR02); 首都临床特色应用研究与成果推广(Z161100000516127); 北京康复医院2019-2021科技发展专项(2019-003); 北京协和医学院教学改革项目(2018E-JG07); 北京协和医学院-国家外国专家局外国专家项目(2015,2016,T2017025,T2018046,G2019001660); 重庆市卫计委医学科研计划项目(2017MSXM090); 重庆市科委社会事业与民生保障科技创新专项项目(cstc2017shmsA130063)

Clinical observation and research on the use of precise electromagnetic power meter (arm dynamometer) for upper limbs to evaluate the holistic function of cardiopulmonary metabolism

TAI Wen-qi1, SUN Xing-guo1, SONG Ya1,2, HAO Lu1,2, WANG Ji-nan1,2, ZHOU Qing-qing1,2, SHI Chao1, XU Fan1, ZHANG Ye1, LIU Fang1   

  1. 1. Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases/ State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Diseases/Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037;
    2. The Affiliated Rehabilitation Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400050, China
  • Received:2020-08-12 Revised:2021-01-12 Published:2021-10-21

摘要: 目的: 受试者分别用上肢(臂力计)和下肢精准电磁功率计(自行车)进行症状限制性极限心肺运动试验(CPET),分析探讨上肢CPET的临床价值。方法: 15例受试者(正常人6例和慢病患者9例)签署知情同意书后在不同的2 d里分别完成上肢和下肢精准电磁功率计CPET,分析CPET数据、计算相关核心指标,探究上肢和下肢CPET的异同及其相关性。结果: ①全体15例受试者男8女7,其中6例正常人和9例慢病患者亚组相比仅年龄((33.2±12.7)比(53.6±8.5)岁)和无诊断疾病有显著差异(P<0.05)。②全体受试者上肢CPET峰值心率((131.0±19.0)比(153.0±22.0) bpm,P<0.05)和血压均低于下肢CPET,但血压差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);上肢CPET的峰值潮气量((1.3±0.4)比(1.8±0.4) L)和分钟通气量((51.4±21.1)比(67.9±22.1) L/min)均显著低于下肢(P均<0.05),而峰值呼吸频率无显著差异;采用上肢CPET时,运动时间((6.4±0.6)比(8.5±1.2) min)要短于下肢CPET;峰值负荷功率((73.2±19.6)比(158.5±40.3)W/min)、峰值摄氧量((1.1±0.4)比(1.7±0.4)L/min)、无氧阈((0.6±0.2)比(0.9±0.2) L/min)、峰值氧脉搏((8.6±2.3)比(10.9±2.6) ml/beat)、摄氧通气效率峰值平台(34.7±4.3比39.8±5.3)均较低,而二氧化碳排出通气效率最小值(32.6±3.8比28.7±4.9)及斜率(33.9±4.3比28.3±6.2)高于下肢CPET(P均<0.05)。正常人和慢病两亚组各自的比较结果与整体比较结果无显著差异。③上肢CPET的运动时间,峰值心率,峰值呼吸频率、潮气量、分钟通气量,峰值负荷功率实测值及百分预计值,峰值摄氧量实测值、公斤体重值和百分预计值,无氧阈实测值、公斤体重值,峰值氧脉搏的实测值,摄氧通气效率峰值平台、二氧化碳排出通气效率最小值和斜率的实测值及百分预计值与下肢CPET的结果相关性较好,其余指标无显著相关性。结论: 作为下肢CPET的补充,上肢CPET用于整体功能状态评估具有极高的可行性和更高的安全性,对于指导安全有效个体化精准运动整体方案的实施提供了重要补充,值得进一步深入探究。

关键词: 上肢精准电磁功率计(臂力计), 下肢精准电磁功率计(功率自行车), 心肺运动试验, 可行性, 安全性

Abstract: Objective: Subjects used upper limb (arm dynamometer) and lower limb precision electromagnetic power meter (cycle ergometer) to perform symptom-restricted limit cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Then we analyzed the clinical value of arm ergometer CPET. Methods: The upper limb and lower limb precision electromagnetic power meters were used to complete the CPET in two different days for 6 normal people and 9 chronic patients. We analyzed CPET data, calculated related core indicators, and compared normal subjects and chronic patients to analyze the similarities and differences between upper and lower extremities and their correlations. Results: ①Compared with 9 patients with chronic diseases, there were significant differences in age ((33.2±12.7) vs (53.6±8.5) years) and diagnosis in 6 normal people. ②The Peak HR ((131.0±19.0) vs (153.0±22.0) bpm,P<0.05) of upper limb CPET of 15 subjects were lower than lower limb CPET, but the difference in blood pressure was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The Peak VT ((1.3±0.4) vs (1.8±0.4) L) and Peak VE ((51.4±21.1) vs (67.9±22.1) L/min) of lower limb CPET were significantly higher than that of upper limb (all P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in Peak BF When upper limb CPET was used, EX-time ((6.4±0.6) vs (8.5±1.2) min) was shorter than lower limb CPET; Peak Work Rate((73.2±19.6) vs (158.5±40.3) W/min), Peak VO2 ((1.1±0.4) vs (1.7±0.4) L/min), AT ((0.6±0.2) vs (0.9±0.2) L/min), Peak VO2/HR ((8.6±2.3) vs (10.9±2.6) ml/beat), OUEP (34.7±4.3 vs 39.8±5.3)were lower, and the Lowest VE/VCO2(32.6±3.8 vs 28.7±4.9), VE/VCO2 Slope (33.9±4.3 vs 28.3±6.2)were higher than those of lower limb CPET (all P<0.05). The comparison results of the two subgroups of normal and chronic patients were the same as the holistic comparison results. ③EX-time, Peak HR, Peak BF, Peak VT and Peak VE of upper limb CPET had good correlation with the results of lower limb CPET. Besides, the measured value and percentage of the projected value of Peak Work Rate, the measured value, kilogram weight value of Peak VO2 and AT, and percentage of the projected value of Peak VO2, the measured value of Peak VO2/HR also had good correlation. The measured value of OUEP, the measured value and percentage of the projected value of Lowest VE/VCO2 and VE/VCO2 Slope were also the same, when the other indicators had no significant correlation. Conclusion: As a supplement to lower limb CPET, upper limb CPET is highly feasible and safe for holistic functional status assessment. It provides an important supplement to guide the implementation of the holistic plan of individualized precision exercise, which is worthy of our further exploration.

Key words: upper limb precision electromagnetic power meter (arm dynamometer), lower limb precision electromagnetic power meter (power bicycle), cardiopulmonary exercise testing, feasibility, safety

中图分类号: 

版权所有 © 2015 《中国应用生理学杂志》编辑部
京ICP备16058274号-1
地址:天津市和平区大理道1号,邮编:300050  电话:022-23909086  E-mail:editor@cjap.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn